$100-$290/hr child and adolescent health work, on your schedule
Review AI-drafted pediatric notes, dosing, and parent guidance the way you'd review a colleague's clinic: flag the adult-extrapolated dose, defend watch-and-recheck over reflexive antibiotics. Fully remote, a few hours a week, paid per task.
Trusted by top research companies
Hi, we're Zac and Jack, the founders of Terac. We want to talk to you directly, because you are the most important part of what we're building.
Terac is a community of experts. People who have spent years getting good at something specific and hard. The world is about to need more of you, not less. As AI takes on more of the world's work, the bottleneck shifts to the people who actually know what they're talking about.
Expert labor is the rarest resource in the world right now, and it is shockingly hard to find. The companies that need a pediatrician's read on a dose that was right for an adult, wrong for a child spend weeks chasing people, paying placement fees, and settling for whoever is available. Meanwhile thousands of qualified people are sitting with knowledge that no one ever asks for.
That gap is what we're here to close. Every project that lands on Terac is routed to the people who actually know the answer, on their schedule, paid fairly, and only when the work is verified. No middleman taking a cut of your time. No vague gigs. No chasing checks.
We care about every single person in this community. If you join Terac, you're not a row in a database to us. We read the feedback. We answer the emails. We will fight for you when a customer is being unreasonable, and we will be honest with you when something on our side is broken. The quality of this panel is our entire company, and we owe you a serious bar.
If you've made it this far, here is what we're asking: claim your profile. Put your expertise on the record. Let the world's most ambitious teams come find you for the work only you can do.
Pediatrics questions
Still curious? Write to us at support@terac.com.
It adds significant value. Neonatal reasoning - fever workups in the first weeks of life, weight-based dosing in tiny patients, recognizing subtle sepsis - is where models fail most dangerously. That depth places you at the upper end of the rate band.
We prefer board-certified pediatricians (ABP or equivalent) in active or recent practice. You confirm your certification and license during onboarding through Government ID and a credential attestation that signals your pediatric expertise.
No. There is no patient and no treatment relationship. You evaluate the model's pediatric reasoning and documentation to improve accuracy and safety for children. It is expert content review, not clinical care or prescribing.
Pediatric visit and well-child notes, weight-based dosing recommendations, developmental and immunization guidance, parent education, and acute-illness triage replies. You flag dosing and reasoning errors and unsafe guidance, then explain the correct age-appropriate approach.
Yes, and it is one of the most safety-critical signals we collect. Catching an adult-extrapolated or miscalculated pediatric dose, then explaining the correct weight-based calculation and its ceiling, is among the highest-value contributions a pediatrician can make.
Why your expertise matters
A model scales adult logic down; you read a child who can't give a history. It gets weight-based dosing, vital-sign norms, and disposition dangerously wrong, and misses age-specific red flags like fever in a neonate. Catching that takes a pediatrician who sees sick children daily, not a textbook. Your corrections teach the model the difference.
How pay works
Pediatricians who handle the highest-stakes presentations - neonates, the acutely ill child, complex weight-based dosing - and can articulate how age and weight reshape each decision land at the top of the $100-$290/hr band. Work is fully remote and paid hourly on verified tasks, with no minimum hours.
What the work looks like
A sample of the child and adolescent health work you would pick up. Every project is scoped, remote, and paid on verified completion.
- Review an AI-drafted pediatric antibiotic dose and flag any value that looks extrapolated from adult dosing rather than calculated by weight.
- Check a model's workup for a 6-week-old with fever against neonatal fever guidelines, flagging any missed step in the sepsis evaluation.
- Write a worked example of distinguishing a toxic-appearing from a well-appearing toddler with fever, naming the exam findings that drive disposition.
- Assess whether an AI-drafted gastroenteritis handout conveys dehydration warning signs and weight-appropriate oral rehydration.
- Flag any developmental or vaccine recommendation in a machine-written well-child note for a 2-year-old that deviates from Bright Futures and ACIP.
- Score the model's replies to a worried parent about a febrile child for accuracy, age-appropriate urgency, and clear return precautions.
Specialties we match
Pediatrics projects span a wide range of focus areas. Tell us where you go deep and we route the work that fits.
- Weight-based and age-adjusted dosing
- Toxic versus well-appearing assessment
- Bright Futures developmental surveillance
- Childhood immunization schedules (ACIP)
- Neonatal and infant fever evaluation
- Pediatric vital sign norms by age
- Growth chart and percentile interpretation
- Pediatric dehydration and fluid management
- Common pediatric infections and stewardship
- Parental counseling and anticipatory guidance
- Child abuse and neglect red-flag recognition
- Adolescent confidentiality and HEADSS screening
